Hinduism - What Is Vaisheshika In Hindu Philosophy?

 

("characteristics noting") One of the six schools of traditional Hindu philosophy, and a school devoted to the clarification of physics and metaphysics in particular.

The Vaisheshika examination of the universe's categories was eventually united with the Nyayas' emphasis on logic to produce the Nyaya Vaisheshika school, commonly referred to as the Naiyayikas.

The Vaisheshika school was atomistic, believing that everything is made up of a few fundamental constituents, and this atomism was at the heart of the school's metaphysics.

The Vaisheshikas were realists in philosophy, believing that the universe was made up of many separate objects that were exactly as they were seen, save in circumstances of perceptual mistake.

They thought that everything was made up of nine essential sub-stances: the five elements, space, time, mind, and Selves, and that everything that existed could be known and named.

The Vaisheshikas believed in the asatkaryavada causal model, which said that when anything was generated, it was a wholly new aggregate, distinct from its constituent components.

Because each act of creation creates a new object, this causal model tends to increase the number of things in the universe.

It also acknowledges that human efforts and acts are one of the factors determining these outcomes, implying that it is theoretically possible to behave in a manner that leads to eventual soul liberation (moksha).

The objects of experience may be classified into six categories, according to the Vaisheshika analysis: substances, qualities, activity, universals, particulars, and inherence (samavaya); some later Vaisheshikas add a seventh category, absences.

The first three categories are perceptible, whereas the others must be inferred; yet, the notion of inherence is important to their philosophy.

Inherence is the subtle glue that holds all of the pieces of the universe together: wholes and parts, substances and qualities, movements and the entities that move, generic traits with specific examples, and, most importantly, pleasure and suffering to the Self.

The philosophical concerns with inherence, especially the idea that it was a single principle rather than a collection of objects, gave them tremendous trouble and led to the formation of the Navyanyaya school, which sought to explain these links in a more nuanced manner.

Indian Philosophical Analysis, edited by Karl H. Potter and Sibajiban Bhattacharyya, was published in 1992, and A Sourcebook in Indian Philosophy, edited by Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan and Charles A. Moore, was published in 1957.

~Kiran Atma


You may also want to read more about Hinduism here.

Be sure to check out my writings on religion here.